Independent analysis · 2026
A small tool for keeping sources honest
I built this because literature tables rot in documents. The matrix keeps a research question tied to a source, a method, a finding, a confidence label and an implication. Add a row. Download CSV. The seed data is from work already on this site. Cursor and Claude helped write the interface. They did not choose the sources.
| Question | Source | Method | Finding | Confidence | Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did women’s own-use bank accounts rise faster than household decision-making? | IIPS / MoHFW, NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 India reports | Published national totals, women 15–49 | Accounts 53.0% to 78.6% (+25.6 pp). Three household decisions 84.0% to 88.7% (+4.7 pp). | high | Scheme MIS that treats a Jan Dhan account as agency is reading the wrong series. |
| Where does the migrant PDS journey break? | CLRA, One Nation Unequal Access (Dec 2024), n=1,012 | Survey funnel | Awareness 71%; attempted claim 51%; served 30%. | medium | A Mumbai grant should buy the served stage, pending a local diagnostic. |
| What does the Act require of a state protection cell? | Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act 2019; Rules 2020 | Statutory reading | Rules require a Transgender Protection Cell under the DGP to monitor offences. | high | Pride Place is the Telangana instantiation. Performance is an empirical question. |
Rows live in this browser until you download them. Built with AI-assisted coding. The seed rows are from sources cited on this site.